I'm a Hardcore Free-Market Advocate, But Medicare for All Represents the Best Hope for US Health System

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. HMO. PPO. EPO. POS. HDHP. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? You should be. Who comprehends all this stuff? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Nor the typical worker. Choosing the right medical coverage for our business – or for our families – seems like it requires advanced expertise in medical insurance.

Our Medical System Is More Than Complicated, It's Expensive

According to recent research, the average family spends $twenty-seven thousand annually for their health insurance (increasing by 6% from last year). The average company healthcare expense is expected to exceed $seventeen thousand per employee by 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Now federal operations has ceased functioning because partisan disputes over tax credits that experts say will lead to a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.

When Will We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

When will we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare program – an established insurance framework – merely extend to include all citizens. Our infrastructure remains intact. How our healthcare providers receive payment changes. Believe me, they will adjust.

The Way National Health Insurance Would Work

A national health insurance program would need payments from employees and employers. In comparable systems, an employee earning average wages pays about 5.3% toward medical coverage. Their employer pays about 13.75%.

Does this appear expensive? Not if you contrast it to what the typical American pays. I know dozens of clients who are routinely paying between 8% to 15% of their employee wages for medical benefits. Remember that with inclusive programs, these contributions include pension plans, sick pay, maternity leave and job loss protection along with funding healthcare facilities. When including those costs versus our current spending on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Execution in the US

For America, a national health premium would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a framework that is already in place. It should be means-based – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. This includes both worker and employer contribution. Similar to much of our government's defense, IT, welfare services and infrastructure, the program should be outsourced by private contractors instead of a government office.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program represents a huge benefit for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would put us on a level playing field with our larger competitors who can afford superior coverage. It would make administration significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding remitted like social security and healthcare taxes, instead of individual transactions to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would enable simpler to plan expenses annual expenditures, instead of going through the complicated (and ineffective) process of negotiating with major insurers required annually each year. Because it's simplified, there would exist a better understanding of coverage among workers – contrasted with existing arrangements where they have to decipher the complications of existing plans. Additionally there would certainly be less liability for companies as we no longer have access to our employees' medical records for purposes of risk assessment and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as possible. However I recognize that public institutions has a significant role in our lives, including national security to funding needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage to all through a national insurance system strengthens economic foundations. It's a better, simpler approach for small businesses that employ more than half of American employees and fund half of our GDP. It makes it possible employees to be healthier, have better attendance and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Exist a million considerations I haven't covered? Of course there are. Given rising medical expenses we've seen in recent years, it's evident that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning very well. And I realize that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes can be readily adopted. But expanding universal Medicare, even with the additional taxes that would be incurred, would remain a better and more affordable approach both for managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Time for Honest Assessment

As Americans, must reduce national pride. America's medical care isn't so great. We rank significantly behind many other countries in healthcare quality globally, according to major studies. Maybe one positive aspect amid current situation is that we undertake a hard look in the mirror and agree that major reforms need to happen.

Christopher Johnson
Christopher Johnson

A seasoned gambling analyst with over a decade of experience in casino game reviews and responsible gaming advocacy.