🔗 Share this article

Via an unsigned decision, the nation's top court has allowed Texas to implement a revised congressional district plan that is projected to include up to five new GOP-friendly districts. The 6-3 order, issued on Thursday, upholds a petition by the state to set aside a federal judge's ruling that had rejected the redistricting plan in November.

Justices' Reasoning

The district court improperly inserted itself into an active primary campaign, generating considerable confusion and disturbing the fine equilibrium in elections, the justices wrote in detailing its decision.

The federal court had previously found that Texas had probably grouped voters according to their race – a method known as illegal race-based districting – when it adopted the boundaries. It had mandated the state to use the maps created after the 2020 census for the next year's election.

Stinging Dissenting Opinion

With a forcefully written objection, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the court's action. She stated that it disrespected the work of the lower court, observing that its decision was written by a judge nominated by former President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan wrote in a opinion co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, This court's stay ensures that Texas's new map, with all its boosted favoritism, will control next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas voters, unjustly, will be placed in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has stated year in and year out, is a violation of the constitution.

Countrywide Redistricting Struggle

The court's action is part of a national contest over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in pushes to reshape the U.S. House map to protect a narrow Republican control. Ordinarily, redistricting occurs after a decennial population count. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a brazen off-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer sparked a wave among other states.

GOP lawmakers in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also approved redistricting plans that might create several additional conservative seats. Democratic lawmakers, in response, have countered with new maps in states like California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those projected gains.

Political Reactions

Lone Star State attorney general praised the High Court's decision. In a comment, he said the order protected Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that ensures electoral outcomes favorable to Republicans. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he added.

Conversely, Democratic representatives criticized the decision. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the leader of a major Democratic election organization.

Another top Democratic leader stated the court had once again damaged its legitimacy by rubber-stamping a discriminatory map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he concluded.