🔗 Share this article

Throughout the previous presidential campaign, Donald Trump wooed voters with promises to reduce prices immediately upon taking office. However, after his inauguration, there was minimal focus to the cost of living. This shifted following inflation-weary citizens delivered a rebuke at the polls. Within days, the Trump administration initiated a hastily assembled campaign to tackle affordability. Regrettably, the drive is a disorganized endeavor—filled with absurdity, contradictions, unrealistic expectations, scapegoating, and Trumpian dishonesty.

Out-of-Touch Claims and Grocery Store Truth

Just two days after the election, Trump began his affordability drive with a disastrous statement: “Food prices are way down. Everything is way down… So I don’t want to hear about the cost of living.” These words from billionaire Trump—who frequently mingles with other ultra-rich individuals—revealed utter contempt for everyday citizens facing difficulties every time they go supermarkets. In effect, he ignored their struggles as trivial, implying they had it wrong about price levels.

This statement about declining prices was highly misleading and dishonest. How could all costs be decreasing when the taxes he imposed were increasing costs? Recent data show the cost of bananas rose 6.9% over the past year, beef prices went up almost 15%, and the cost of coffee surged 18.9%—partly due to import taxes on Brazil’s coffee and beef. In the first three quarters, costs increased in five of the six food categories monitored by the Consumer Price Index, such as meats, poultry, and fish (rising over 4%), non-alcoholic beverages (up 2.8%), and fruits and vegetables (rising slightly).

Contradictions and Falsehoods in Financial Claims

In spite of the evidence, the president persists in repeating his big lie about lower costs. After the vote, he has claimed there is “virtually no inflation,” declared “costs have fallen significantly,” and asserted “it is far less expensive under Trump than it was under his predecessor.” Such remarks ignore the fact that general costs have clearly increased since Biden left office. At present, inflation is running at a 3 percent per year, which is 50% higher than the central bank’s target of 2 percent. Adding to the inaccuracies, he boasted that gas prices had fallen to around two dollars, even though official data show they are over three dollars.

Confronted by reality and lower approval ratings, advisers evidently cautioned that his “costs are falling” message portrayed him as disconnected from ordinary people. Many citizens are angry about rising costs following assurances of decreases. As a result, advisers suggested one quick fix: reduce certain import taxes. The logical move clashed with Trump’s absurd assertion that additional taxes wouldn’t raise prices for US consumers.

Proposed Fixes and Their Possible Impact

As some tariffs reduced on several food items, Trump will likely claim that he has lowered costs once these products start declining in price. This would be similar to a firestarter boasting for extinguishing a blaze that he had started. On another occasion, while speaking McDonald’s executives, he declared that “we are in the peak period of America” and told the audience that “costs are decreasing and all of that stuff.” These comments come naturally for a billionaire to make, but they ring hollow to millions of Americans who are struggling—particularly when many risk losing food stamps or rising insurance costs.

Per a recent poll conducted last fall, 74% of Americans think the state of the economy are mediocre or bad, while just a quarter consider them positive. A separate survey showed that 61% of Americans feel the administration’s actions have “made the economy worse” in the country.

Financial Reality and Suggested Measures

Scott Bessent, the president’s top economic official, lately disputed claims of a prosperous era. He noted that far from booming, some parts of the US economy “are in recession.” The manufacturing sector—which Trump vowed to save—seems to have shrunk for multiple consecutive months and shed approximately 33,000 jobs this year. Citing these challenges, Bessent called on the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates—an action that could help affordability.

Reacting to public dismay about affordability, the president suggested a cash handout of “a payout of at least $2,000 a person” excluding “the wealthy.” For many households in need, it seems like manna from heaven, but the prospects are dim that lawmakers—already alarmed about huge budget deficits—will enact the proposal. This idea would likely increase federal spending, push up interest rates, and possibly drive prices higher by putting more money into the economy.

Another proposed solution for cost issues centered on introducing 50-year mortgages, with the notion that this would reduce monthly mortgage payments. However, reality is that such lengthy loans would do little to reduce installments—often reducing them by just $100 or $200 per month. The drawback is that these mortgages could significantly increase the overall cost homeowners pay and hinder their accumulation of equity.

Blaming the Past Government and Economic Outlook

As part of their cost-cutting effort, Trump and his team have again pointed fingers at Biden for economic problems, such as rising prices. Spokespeople claimed they “inherited a disaster from Joe Biden” and were “addressing Biden’s inflation.” These are absurd and untruthful allegations. In reality, Biden handed over a strong economy, with inflation way down, solid expansion, and unemployment low. However, the current administration’s actions—particularly his tariffs—have created an economic mess, pushing up prices and reducing economic output.

According to Mark Zandi, lead analyst at a research firm, 22 states are experiencing economic decline, with their conditions worsened by Trump’s tariffs. He fears that if key regions such as California and New York enter a downturn, the nation could face a widespread recession. During recessions, consumers typically have reduced funds to spend, and inflation often falls. Sadly, with Trump’s much-ballyhooed affordability campaign likely to do little to control costs, his most effective “tool” for achieving increased affordability might prove to be triggering an economic contraction—something that hard-pressed households cannot handle.