🔗 Share this article

A collective of individuals affected by the state-led crackdown amid the 2022 demonstrations for "Women, Life, Freedom" has filed a first-of-its-kind legal case targeting forty identified Iranian officials of suspected international crimes.

Legal Action Initiated in the Argentinian System

The formal request for a judicial probe to be opened was lodged within the Argentine judicial framework. This move was taken by a group of Iranians assisted by a non-governmental legal group. The Argentinian judicial system are recognized for accepting cases based on universal jurisdiction.

The filing claims that the actions from state security apparatus to the protests included "firing lethal rounds, marker guns, harmful pellets improperly used for crowd control, and other projectiles at demonstrators." The document further states arbitrary roundups, custodial torture, and executions of individuals that reportedly persist to this day.

Officials Named Anonymously

Certain agents representing the various branches of Iran's law enforcement have been identified in the legal documents, but their personal details are currently being withheld from the public.

Individual Accounts Drive the Case

One of the individuals behind the case, residing in the United Kingdom Mahsa Piraei, explained that the objective "is not revenge in a private capacity, but accountability and transparency." Her parent, Minoo Majidi, in her sixties, was shot dead in the autumn of 2022. Autopsy reports revealed more than 167 harmful shots had been shot at her posterior at extremely close proximity. She had been participating in a public demonstration over the death of Mahsa Amini, a young Kurdish woman who was killed while detained.

Piraei, among Majidi's three children, was residing abroad at the time of her mother's brutal death. She returned to Iran at significant personal danger to see the gravesite. Her sister Roya published a picture of herself by their mother's grave with her head shorn on a private social media account. A friend published the image, which went viral, subsequently leading Roya to seek exile for Turkey.

Piraei added: "Via legal filings and evidence the aim is to preserve evidence, name crimes and avoid historical oblivion." She said her mother's death as "not an isolated incident but part of a widespread tactic."

Additional Complainants Consist of Those Shot in the Eye

The remaining litigants who have come forward are Kowsar Eftekhari and Mersedeh Shahinkar, both survivors of blinding at point-blank by marker guns.

Eftekhari, a 23-year-old scholar, was struck in the face in October 2022. She had been protesting for weeks, observing fellow demonstrators being struck by live ammunition and being beaten herself with electronic batons. During a demonstration on a day in October, she was at a demonstration near a educational institution when a plainclothes officer struck her with multiple paintballs from a range of about a meter. He then reportedly fired at her face when she did not respond to his command to leave. A footage of the assault showing injuries from her eye went viral, and she was eventually offered protection in Germany.

Shahinkar, 38 at the time when injured on 18 October, only understood what had occurred when she sensed something wet on her eye. Fellow individuals cautioned her not to enter an emergency vehicle for fear of being delivered to a police station. When she later got to a health center, a staff member ordered her to leave because they would not treat protesters. A doctor saw her and directed her to a medical center, where Shahinkar said a rock had inadvertently hurt her vision so she would not be denied treatment. She posted photos of her condition online, and in early 2023, plainclothes officers approached her, prompting her to flee Iran. She later collected a notable recognition as a symbol of the movement.

Global Legal Concept Creates Avenue for Action

The individuals seeking the legal probe state that the complaint is not seen just as a symbolic gesture with no hope of a concrete result. This legal principle enables cases to be examined in a third country even if the violation did not happen in that nation and the suspect is not present there. The Argentinian system has some of the most liberal regulations on such cases in the world.

The doctrine of international justice has in the past resulted in dozens of convictions and the initiation of prosecutions covering crimes committed in many nations. Legal actions are presently being pursued in multiple nations worldwide.

As the application is only for a judicial probe, and this is not seeking financial compensation, there is no request by the complainants for financial restitution. This filing would not represent the initial legal action against Iranian figures brought in Argentina.